We’ve seen school officials nationwide instructed not to disclose students’ alternative pronoun use when talking to parents. We’ve seen other schools being directed to refrain from disclosing the chest-binding practices of students to their parents. Now, Libs of TikTok has obtained evidence that not only are schools keeping this information from parents and feeding students’ delusions that they can change their sex, but they are also facilitating potentially harmful transitioning practices.
The Marxist government's default position is that all parents are bad and it's only government that knows best. We are in for some scary days if they insist on going down this road. Keep up the good work, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Permission slips for every trip to the park; when grandma came to pick up my son there were multiple APB’s…he was being kidnapped! My son has had to make us sign quizzes and homework. But sex change, no, now that is top secret.
First, the writer may want to check the definition of “litany”, I see neither religious recitations nor complaints on the posted list as in “litany of complaints” - though this blog itself is clearly a “litany”: probably should tighten up Standard Written English. It’s a disarmingly handwritten (so rare in the digital world) list of concerns which could be spoken about between a counselor and a child. Second, only 2 of the 14 refer to LGBTQ - the writer should realize that all children who aren’t sterile go through puberty, need a healthy body image, definitely should be off social media, etc. I’d welcome a child wanting to speak about LGB issues if they weren’t LGB - healthy curiosity - “Yes, girls can get married to each other when they grow up! Oh so Laura won’t be alone. Yes honey.” The critique the writer levels in this post would come off more valuable if they couldn’t be simply dismissed as being out-of-touch.
As for the core of the post, no professional in a school should be directing children in the use of or giving children binders, or _any other sexually-expressive article of clothing_. To me, LGBTQ is irrelevant, it’s the fact that it’s sexualized clothing.
No binders, no push-up bras, assless chaps, pasties, G-strings, harnesses, stiletto boots, cockrings, corsets... you get the idea. Never. Ever. Were I a parent I would call the police on the basis of inappropriate sexual contact with a child, relating to sexualizing their body (what a subjunctive!)
Focus on inappropriate sexualisation, not on GLBTQ. You’ll get more attention.
This is just the tip of the proverbial ice berg. If you really want to look into the soul of transgenderism directed at children you need to look at the relationship between GLSEN, The Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network ( GLSEN.org )and CDC ( https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/youth-resources.htm)
I had to sign a permission slip for the school to give my child cough drops, but this is legal?
The Marxist government's default position is that all parents are bad and it's only government that knows best. We are in for some scary days if they insist on going down this road. Keep up the good work, sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Luciferians want to corrupt and destroy your children. When will the masses stop being afraid of calling evil for what it is and to confront it?
Permission slips for every trip to the park; when grandma came to pick up my son there were multiple APB’s…he was being kidnapped! My son has had to make us sign quizzes and homework. But sex change, no, now that is top secret.
This is so evil.
Disgusting !!
First, the writer may want to check the definition of “litany”, I see neither religious recitations nor complaints on the posted list as in “litany of complaints” - though this blog itself is clearly a “litany”: probably should tighten up Standard Written English. It’s a disarmingly handwritten (so rare in the digital world) list of concerns which could be spoken about between a counselor and a child. Second, only 2 of the 14 refer to LGBTQ - the writer should realize that all children who aren’t sterile go through puberty, need a healthy body image, definitely should be off social media, etc. I’d welcome a child wanting to speak about LGB issues if they weren’t LGB - healthy curiosity - “Yes, girls can get married to each other when they grow up! Oh so Laura won’t be alone. Yes honey.” The critique the writer levels in this post would come off more valuable if they couldn’t be simply dismissed as being out-of-touch.
As for the core of the post, no professional in a school should be directing children in the use of or giving children binders, or _any other sexually-expressive article of clothing_. To me, LGBTQ is irrelevant, it’s the fact that it’s sexualized clothing.
No binders, no push-up bras, assless chaps, pasties, G-strings, harnesses, stiletto boots, cockrings, corsets... you get the idea. Never. Ever. Were I a parent I would call the police on the basis of inappropriate sexual contact with a child, relating to sexualizing their body (what a subjunctive!)
Focus on inappropriate sexualisation, not on GLBTQ. You’ll get more attention.
This is just the tip of the proverbial ice berg. If you really want to look into the soul of transgenderism directed at children you need to look at the relationship between GLSEN, The Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network ( GLSEN.org )and CDC ( https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/youth-resources.htm)
I have been writing about this since October ( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/diversity-using-our-children-to-create-a4d ). Volume III is in the works. Individual chapters can be found at https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com --- subscriptions are free. The issue is monumentally important.
The federal government, corporate America, the NEA, The CDC, YouTube Kids, and major "Christian" denominations (https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/volume-iii-chapter-3-the-battle-field-660) are all targeting your children and grandchildren either with their own policies or their association/partnership with GLSEN.