29 Comments
User's avatar
Suzi Nilsson 's avatar

The ONLY WAY to win this long war is to double down at each battle dear... JUST THE WAY YOU ARE. Keep it up there are millions of us behind you. You are a HEROINE! ♥️

Expand full comment
NCmom's avatar

Yes!!! I just donated. I hope others do as well.

Expand full comment
Rachel Mills's avatar

You should have your attorneys look into Hugh Hefner's case against the post office in 1954. Took the very catholic postmaster general Summerlin all the way to the SCOTUS because USPS didn't want to deliver their offensive content. SCOTUS ruled in favor of Playboy and told the post office to just deliver the mail. These platforms should be deemed common carriers and treated the same way.

Expand full comment
jamie b.'s avatar

Agreed. Free speech laws need to be extended to popular platforms of this sort.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
jamie b.'s avatar

"It can't be done without shredding the Bill of Rights."

And what about the livelihood of people who rely on social media? The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the ability to pursue one’s common calling is a fundamental right protected under the Privileges and Immunities Clause. From this perspective social media would be a public service no different than eg. the phone company.

"You cannot force private businesses to publish you..."

Nobody would be forced to 'publish' anything. They're simply providing a venue for people to communicate their own thoughts and opinions. Social media is in essence acting as a public square.

"We are fighting for censorship..."

Speak for yourself.

Frankly, you're coming across as a tad unhinged.

Expand full comment
Pearl Red Moon's avatar

He is, and has been banned from other Substacks for ad hominem attacks and homophobia.

Expand full comment
jamie b.'s avatar

I see what you mean...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Pearl Red Moon's avatar

There are 3 kinds of sexual attraction that are "normal" for humans = hetero, same sex or bi-sex. My granddaughter is 15 and says she is attracted to girls. Her parents and I love and support her. It may be a phase, time will tell...but if she goes through the rest of her life choosing female partners we don't view that as "perversion".

I find your outrage toward humans attracted to their own sex deeply distasteful and disturbing. I think your fury is pathological and beyond a "tad" unhinged.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
jamie b.'s avatar

You need a hobby.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Rachel Mills's avatar

Arguably Twitter is now part of the executive branch as well.

Expand full comment
ThirdWorldBS's avatar

Hang in there. You are making a difference. You know that because they keep coming at you. Don't give up. I'm donating monthly, got a "Stop Grooming" shirt and will keep supporting you! Blessings all around you, my friend!

Expand full comment
Jacktron's avatar

I got banned from Twitter for using an idiom

Expand full comment
Allen Kenna Stewart's avatar

I can't really donate right now, but I did the next best thing: I just subscribed. You deserve the support! I too was permanently banned from Twitter, for defending the genetic reality that there are only biological males and females, and transgender people are confused, deluded, or mentally ill men and women who deserve our pity and compassion, but should not be enabled. My perfectly reason-based comment was labeled "hate speech". Makes you wonder just how many trans people work at Twitter...

Expand full comment
Beth's avatar

Keep going! Parents and "normal" people need you to keep going.

Expand full comment
Ron K's avatar

When you decide to actually start suing let me know. I and millions of others are behind you.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Suzi Nilsson 's avatar

I didn’t see her say she has a defense fund? Also she’s not a defendant.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ron K's avatar

When you don't like the response, just lie and act as if there was no response. It makes you look foolish but if you don't care, in your mind, it is a win. To the rest of the thinking world you are just clueless or a liar.

Expand full comment
john paval's avatar

Not sending any financial support now, but be sure to let us know if and when you resort to litigation and I will make a modest donation. It is not hateful to resend truthful documents put in the public record by others. What is it the Washington Post puts on its masthead? "Democracy dies in darkness". And we are all sick to death of Twitter consigning to darkness truthful material as "hateful" when what is hateful are the activities of the people being exposed. God bless you.

Expand full comment
Jon's avatar

When you start tweeting again just attach the ticktock video without any comment. Your comment isn’t needed. Then see how long before they still suspend you again. After you are/ stop the bullshit and sue their asses already

Expand full comment
Andrew Eden-Balfour's avatar

You do realize it's technically a tax fraud to claim that these donations are tax-deductible if the organization establishing the fund is a non-profit charitable org formed under 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, right?

Expand full comment
K S's avatar

Twitter gave me a 7 day ban for my comment about that same specific video (shown above) of the adult dancing provocatively in front of children. My tweet ssid “what is good about an adult dancing like a sl*t for children?” - they told me it was hateful harassing content etc etc.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

If you lose your appeal, how many more "strikes" before a permanent ban?

Expand full comment
Peter Billing MD FACS's avatar

You’ll have to litigate. It’s the only way to resolve the matter at this juncture.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Allen Kenna Stewart's avatar

Marek, as I said above, is a self-important, self-righteous, absolutist crank whose rants haven't gotten a single like, and apparently is attacking Chaya because he thinks she is ignoring him, therefore is "censoring" him, therefore is "cover[ing] up the gay pedophilia [he] expose[s]." LOOK AT ME, DAMMIT!!! From his posts, she is well justified in ignoring him...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 29, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Allen Kenna Stewart's avatar

You haven't put forward any facts or evidence. Instead of waiting for Chaya to publish the "evidence", man up and do it yourself. Then we'll have something to discuss. Until then, based on your posts, I stand by my description of you.

Expand full comment